YIKE: Chicago Pass Defense
![]() |
|
| Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images |
Can the loss of one player really mean the systemic breakdown of an entire defense? Harris is a superlative DT that pressures the QB and tackles rushers, but it hardly seems possible that one man can have such an impact on a great defense like the Bears'. And yet -- Week 1-13: 12.0 points against per game; week 14-17: 26.3 points against per game.
While the Bears faced an easy schedule overall, the first group of games featured two top 11 offenses from the NY Giants (22.2 points per game) and NE Patriots (24.1 ppg) and an overall average of 19.7 ppg per opponent. The second group averaged 18.5 ppg; though with significant outliers in both Tampa (13.2) and St. Louis (22.9).
It's easy to see four games as a small sample size and simply discount them as an aberration, but when you realize that a football game is so frenzied and full of individual plays--198 passing and 93 rushing, or 291 total plays defended in those four games alone--that argument is weakened quite a bit. The Bears defensive struggles are very real but also very perplexing. This coming Sunday, Matt Hasselbeck--and a more talented passing offense than any of the Bears last four opponents--could just as probably light up the Bears for 300 yards in the air or misfire for 3 picks. Here are three Bears that will help decide.
![]() |
|
| Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images |
Monte Kiffen, Tony Dungy, Lovie Smith, et al developed the modern day Tampa 2. The major difference between the two was an emphasis in the Tampa 2 on smaller speedier players to rush the passer on the line, and dropping the MLB deep to cover the gap between the split safeties. It wouldn't be surprising if in twenty years people refer to Urlacher as the prototype for MLB in the Tampa 2, but, then, some contemporaries would disagree.
Urlacher is subject to the polarized opinions, lofty praise and searing rebuke of a Derek Jeter. He's been on so many overrated and underrated lists it's patently absurd, and cutting through the dross to some sort of intelligent evaluation is next to impossible.
Here's what we can be sure of. Urlacher is a flyer of the highest order. The guy finds a way into the frame on almost every defensive play, though sometimes he's simply the fourth or fifth player in a pile. As the deep man in the middle he is frequently called on to cover TE's--especially on deep post routs--a job he, Lance Briggs and the entire Bears defense is mind-bendingly good at. Not only does Urlacher stop passes, but he's one of the meanest tacklers in football. Whatever problems the Bears have had defending the pass the last four games, I can assure you it's not Brian Urlacher's fault.
Considering the impotence of TEs against the Bears, and the Nigerian Royals presupposed use of Locklear as a red carpet to Hasselbeck, it would behoove Seattle to keep the TE in on max protect and let Seattle's receivers find a whole in the Bears' zone.
| © espn.com |
Vasher is a well rounded cornerback whose athleticism and big-play ability make him well suited for the Cover 2. Vasher is not a great cover corner. He has a reputation for biting on the double move and falling for play-action. In the game against Carolina last year Smith absolutely shredded Chicago's zones for 12 receptions/218 yards, and shed Vasher's coverage like a wet set of clothes. The Hawks have no single player of Smith's receiving ability, but with an absurd amount of depth at WR have a veritable mismatch against any DB covering them. That is, only if they are able to isolate those corners.
In two of the Bears final four games Chicago was facing a team with a Mike Martz, or a Martz-derived offense. Martz loves to use max protect and send wide receivers deep on complicated routs. If the QB is given time, this strategy is excellent at consistently beating a Cover 2 deep. The Hawks offense is much closer to Tampa Bay's, with lots of passes underneath right in the teeth of the Bears' zone. Two of Rattay's three TDs and 108 of his 268 yards came on long bombs to Joey Galloway and Ike Hilliard.
For Seattle to be successful on Sunday the Hawk's passing attack must be able to break habit and find receivers deep, because if Mike Holmgren and Hasselbeck play conservatively, balls will be tipped, receivers will be surrounded and passes will be intercepted.
A place to bury strangers.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
in your opinion
by Captain Morgan on Jan 8, 2007 5:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I guess, in a way, Womack
The real key to the game was that the Seahawks got no pressure on Grossman; my lasting memory of the game was Rex just sitting back and waiting until our zones broke down. Honestly, I remember thinking that Chicago was getting away with bloody murder holding our guys. The Bears O-Line has had an excellent year, but I do think the Hawks will get much better pressure on Grossman Sunday. I think we've all seen what happens when they don't.
by John Morgan on Jan 8, 2007 6:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes chad
by stlcardinalsfang on Jan 8, 2007 8:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Chad ain't a troll.
Trash-talking isn't necessarily trolling either, until people's lineage, mothers and reproductive organs get into the question.
Even then, let's face it, some people's reproductive organs are askin' for it.
by Shrug on Jan 8, 2007 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But Terry (from Blogging the Boys)
by Phildopip on Jan 9, 2007 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ya I noticed that also
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 9, 2007 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
terry has taken a bit of heat
by mikeFromWCG on Jan 9, 2007 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We were ripping him about his man love for
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 9, 2007 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hello, Terry Glen!
by Chad on Jan 9, 2007 12:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well at this point Glenn is better than Moss.
by John Morgan on Jan 9, 2007 1:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's...
I love to talk smack but I'll bet you if you met up with me for some beers, we'd all get along just fine. Terry, however, seems like a really angry guy.
by Chad on Jan 9, 2007 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so where does that put me shrug???
by stlcardinalsfang on Jan 9, 2007 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm phoning it in this week.
Have no immediate answer to your other question.
by Shrug on Jan 10, 2007 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like Rex Grossman's vulva.
And don't even get me started about Brian Urlacher's mom...
by John Morgan on Jan 8, 2007 9:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree on one point:
by peterpeter on Jan 9, 2007 7:06 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
You have to remember that we have been using
Also I would rather stay away from 4 to 5 reciever sets thats what we did last time and it bit us in the ass. We got stevens this time so lets use him.
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 9, 2007 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great write up John
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 9, 2007 10:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
few things
After they clinched home field they have been without either entirely or at one point Vasher, Tillman and Todd Johnson. This led to Hester starting for the first time at corner, and he has some work to do. It also led to felon R.M. Jr. to leave the nickel role and start. In that same time frame of the last few games Rivera also came out saying that he was trying some newer alignments and wanted to make his guys "uncomfortable" in game situations. Well they were as they gave up a ton of passing yards. In the Tampa Bay game the two longer touchdowns were short to medium passes that initial missed tackles by one of the starting rookies allowed a score. (That's by memory, not sure of the yardage exactly but they were catches that should have resulted in yardage only, not scores).
This team makes me nervous for a thousand different reasons, but at this moment I am not terrified of the defense. That'll probably change after lunch.
by mike b on Jan 9, 2007 10:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Alphonso Boone at DT for Tommie Harris.
I'm rather surprised to hear that both of the long Tampa Bay TD passes were thrown short, as that is exactly the kind play the Cover 2 should be able to prevent.
My point wasn't to say that the Bears are weak on defense, I'm pretty sure we would all agree that's ludicrous, but only to explain key match-ups the Hawks must win to succeed.
The YIKE: Run D will be up shortly.
by John Morgan on Jan 9, 2007 1:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
super sub
I don't think anyone (I certainly didn't) took your comments as saying the D was bad, but like with everybody's team there are some points that don't always make themselves clear unless you watch every snap and then again on TIVO in double time. A dew unfamiliar schemes and a couple broken tackles led to an extra 100+ yards receiving and a couple scores, and some inflated passing o numbers.
by mike b on Jan 9, 2007 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You are correct
Either Tillman or Vasher has been out and that has produced the Peter Principle in the secondary. Felon Jr was an above average nickel but a below average corner. This left Hester playing nickel and that is a position that all opposing teams should be happy about.
I'm happy to report that Tillman has been practicing all week and he says that he is healthy so I'm expecting more of a Bears defense this weekend.
Whats with you Seattle fans the reports are that there are plenty of tickets due to less of a demand without Dallas or Philly fans. I saw plenty of Seattle fans back in October at the game. Does this mean that you will only travel when the weather is nice for your team??
by boerwinkle on Jan 9, 2007 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm to poor to travel
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 9, 2007 3:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm from wcg
by mike b on Jan 9, 2007 3:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm putting myself through college
by John Morgan on Jan 9, 2007 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure...
Nice excuse.
by Chad on Jan 9, 2007 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















