Quick Cap: New Orleans 28, Seattle 17
What hurts the most is that New Orleans still sucks. What a tease, we almost came back against a team that was ground into dust by the Tampa Bay Bucs. Wheeeee.
I have no ancillary interests so I'm going to tell you what everyone else is scared to say:
The Hawks are going to make the playoffs...
And then some team is going to use their eye socket in an obscene way.
Any hope of true contention is over. The 2007 Hawks can aspire to the heights of the 1992 Buffalo Bills. No they can't. A reasonable argument exists that whatever NFC team makes it to the Super Bowl will have their tongue stapled to an ant hill by the Patriots, Colts, Steelers...take heart in that if you enjoy sour grapes.
Meanwhile, the rest of the NFC West is falling in on itself. Arizona is contending with Tim Rattay and Kurt Warner manning the helm. The 49ers are looking forward to Alex Smith returning after the bye. Saint Louis has a shot!! The division is in hand, ha. Ha. Haaaa...
Shaun Alexander is being booed. It's not the play calling (ed. Okay some it is the play calling), that's heroic by Holmgren (who will retire) to take the blame, but the fans are sick of Alexander playing poorly. They're not booing just because he's playing poorly, but because they believe he can play better. I read it every day on Seahawks Insider: "he's soft", "he's not running hard", "he never was good". Alexander is 30, his foot is broken--give the guy a break. He's just not very good anymore. I wish I could join in on the ad hominem attacks; it certainly turns the game into some kind of grotesque parable. The Saints wanted it more. Seattle quit on the field. The Hawks deserved to lose. Seattle was beat by a mediocre team, because they are a mediocre team. They suffered a little bit of bad luck. They're a little bit banged up. They were outplayed, too.
Like Saint Louis, a few stray injuries to a few key players keep Seattle from poor and inconsistent to awful and ugly. The team is old and thin at essential positions; it's also young and talented at others. If Hasselbeck isn't killed in the next 10 weeks, he's a championship caliber quarterback for a couple more seasons. Rocky Bernard (28) Deon Grant (28) Julian Peterson (29) Patrick Kerney (30) and Walter Jones (33) will not play better next year. Sean Locklear and Marcus Trufant will depart this offseason. The net result will leave Seattle squarely in rebuilding mode. We'll start looking into what 2007 can mean for 2008 and what 2008 can mean for 2009, tomorrow. The season is not over. The Hawks will play some good games to come, they will play some bad, but anything resembling true contention is over.
Goodnight everyone.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
you wanna know something sad
by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 14, 2007 8:36 PM PDT reply actions
tpb
it's entirely possible
There's nothing written that we can't come out with more stinkers against the Rams, Niners, Cards, and everyone else we play. Unlikely, sure, but after tonight, everything is within the realm of possibility.
by dinosco on Oct 14, 2007 8:53 PM PDT reply actions
funny thing is
I don't know what to say other than we might finally see less Alexander
This game
n/s
The most obvious aspect of this nausea-oleum was that the Seahawks very clearly underprepared for the Saints. I don't think potentially good teams necessarily take 0-5 teams for granted, but whatever happened in practice didn't show up on the field.
Brees was never under an iota of pressure, but threw like he was in a hurry. Thing is, every Saint was on the same page. The differences between Reggie Bush and Shaun Alexander are arena-sized in their obviousness. Bush has about a million adjustment steps that you can see in slo-mo; Shaun is... (sigh) You know, I'm just not gonna heap on 'em. As long as he's the focus of our running game, we're not going to have a running game.
Everyone in Qwest was depressed. I couldn't get money out of the ATM because the system was unavailable, meaning I couldn't even drink my way to peace in the second half.
The one bright spot was Leonard Weaver. And I don't have anything particularly revelatory to say about him. Nice job.
I agree with Morgan. This is not a contending team. They look panicked. They're slow. They're taking too much time. They're leaving too much of themselves exposed. The decision-making has to be called into question. The fans are tired of the foregone predictability.
The Saints are better than their record, but still -- this was one of those games where you feel like shaking someone.
N/S Morgan
Ugh.
I don't know what else to say at this point, except that watching these games is absolutely awful because it's not like the Hawks are completely terrible top to bottom. It's how Seneca Wallace steps up with a huge catch, how Leonard Weaver goes 20+ yards, how Roethlisberger gets sacked for 3rd and 15, then Hasselbeck tosses a soft air ball for an interception, Alexander falls over behind the line of scrimmage, and Big Ben completes a 20 yard pass for the first down.
by Captain Morgan on Oct 14, 2007 9:48 PM PDT reply actions
n/s
That's when I screamed "what the hell." The people around me said worse.
this teams just looks 9-7
Weaver- 3 carries 40 yards
Shaun - 14 carries 34 yards
Weaver also did a nice job catching some passes (expect for that one he easily dropped)
I know that this probably isn't the best way to look at the running game, since all of Weaver's yards came on one play, but I think everyone gets the picture.
Kudos to the Saints, this looked a lot more like their team from 2006, I think they've already dug themselves to big of a hole, but hey...you never know.
Honestly, it doesn't hurt anymore. The first two L's hurt because I thought this was a team that could make a real run at a superbowl, now I know they are a 9-7 team, so going 10-6 would be a plus for me.
Reluctant game balls:
Weaver and Mebane. Mebane seemed to be in the backfield a lot, Bush was probably too elusive for him to make the tackles however.
Too sad to comment. with anything profound
Please make sure you touch on the following in your recap. I'm just an fan who drinks too much at the game.
Hill- is he hurt.... or are Bush and Eric Johnson that good?
Jennings- Is that two weeks in a row that he was AWOL all game?
D-line- Tough for the secondary to look good when Brees is counting 5 alligator in the pocket.
Burl and Obu- Really? do they ever run a full route? Is it acceptable to run up the the CB and tickle him instead of getting any separation?
Russell-only guy who puts the ball carrier on the ground everytime he touches them.
I don't know..... I'm sad. MH called an awful game. SA is done. Momo will never (and shouldn't) get a chance. Weaver looks good because everything else looks so bad. Kerney is Wistrom.... contrary to my week 1-2 excitement/expectations.
Are we average? Are we below? Don't answer that one please.
Honestly...
which team are we?
I think one thing is clear though, regardless of the running game, and Shaun Alexanders talent at this moment, i think it's fair to say we several other important things to worry about.
I'm not defending Shaun, nor am i giving him praise, however it should be noted that in comparison to some of the holes Reggie Bush was getting to run through tonight, Shaun was like a magnet to defenders. It seemed like we weren't able to create much running space beyond the first level. I know Shaun is in decline, that's fine, but our passing game was not in good sync, and i wasn't full impressed by our blocking either.
I was most upset by our defense, it was frustrating, and almost felt like the last few years were over. I don't know what exactly was happening, but a defense with our team speed should be able to get in the right spots without being completely taken out of the play.
As far as our team, it's so difficult to tell right now. Is the absense Branch and Burleson really throwing Hasselbeck off this much? Is our d-line finally catching up to us? Undersized, injured, and aging. The speed is great, so is the hustle, but i couldn't believe the lack of penetration.
I hope Tru and Locklear stay in response to your post.
To me
He can't succeed like this because he isn't the type of QB that can carry a team.
by Scruffy Lefty on Oct 15, 2007 7:00 AM PDT up reply actions
n/s
now that I think about it
Ugh, I like Mike Holmgren, too. The prospect of him retiring is not one I want to consider.
by Captain Morgan on Oct 15, 2007 12:58 AM PDT reply actions
That game was horrible
How fast is Leonard Weaver?
by David on Oct 15, 2007 11:18 AM PDT reply actions
Haha
Too bad your car will get egged.
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Oct 15, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Hawks are just not that good
by The Ghost of Kenny Easley on Oct 15, 2007 12:29 PM PDT reply actions
At what point does the orginazation fire Marshall
Ironically, when Hass is given time in the pocket he frequently is UN-able to find an open man. Is this Hass or are the receivers (excepting Ingram) not doing enough to get open? Probably both.
Hello late eighties Seahawks...good to see you again.
by Harrison @ Field Gulls on Oct 15, 2007 1:23 PM PDT reply actions
He misses Branch
Asked point blank whether he dreamed of having an A-list receiver in his life, Brady indicated that Branch was in fact that guy, saying, "Deion is the most important player on our offense. When I look at the elite receivers in the game, he is second to nobody. He doesn't get a lot of the credit, because we do spread the ball around here, and he doesn't feel a need to promote himself like so many guys at that position. But he is that good."
Branch has really become he is goto guy that can always get open and make big plays after the catch.
by Scruffy Lefty on Oct 15, 2007 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions

by 

























