Field Gulls: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Is Derek Anderson For Real?

No one seemed to think so 8 weeks ago. Back then he was embroiled in a ceremonial quarterback controversy. Anderson and Charlie Frye were battling for that coveted placeholder position until the recently drafted Brady Quinn could take over. If not for Quinn's holdout, it's entirely possible that Anderson never would have seen a starting snap, instead shuffled to backup duties, his career subject to Quinn's health, Romeo Crennel's whims and the dreaded "career backup" title. Now the former sixth rounder is the biggest surprise in the NFL, helming the 12th best offense in the NFL and stoking an improbable quarterback controversy in Cleveland.

Coaching instability and the resulting dearth of NFL talent may have held down Anderson's stock. In 2001, the Beavers lost premier receiving tandem Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh to the pros. The next year OSU head coach Dennis Erickson returned to the NFL to coach the San Francisco 49ers. In 2002, under new coach Mike Riley, Anderson got his first collegiate start. In the three years Anderson started the Beavers produced one NFL talent on offense, Steven Jackson, drafted in 2003, and two practice squad players: guard Doug Nienhuis and receiver Mike Hass. Despite this poor cast of surrounding players, Anderson became only the 6th player in Pac-10 history to pass for more than 10,000 yards. That was on 1515 attempts, for a hair over 50% completion percentage.

Anderson was drafted in the sixth round of the 2005 draft by the Baltimore Ravens. The Ravens cut Anderson September 20th of 2005, but former Raven and current Browns GM, Phil Savage, signed him the next day. He's big, toolsy, with a great deep ball, some impressive raw figures for an underwhelming Oregon State team in transition and a reputation as a hard worker and quick study. OSU coach Riley had this to say about Anderson, "Since we've known him, he has constantly gotten better. It's been really fun working with him, because he's like a sponge. He just loves to learn and get better. I wish we had another year."

Constant improvement might be a theory for Anderson's out of the blue breakout this season. A good collection of talent and an offensive line capable of giving him time should also be factored in. Another very real possibility is that a lot of air exists in Anderson's numbers. Among the top 20 quarterbacks in DPAR, Anderson is the only one with a completion percentage lower than 60% (56%). His game is built around deep completions, a mercurial quality that can make an offense, like last year's Saints, look unstoppable one game and downright awful another. Like those 2006 Saints, three players on the Browns squad are averaging more than 16 yards per reception. I removed any player with less than 10 receptions from the Saints. In fact, Anderson completes a pass of 20 or more yards every 7.4 attempts, a full attempt better than even Tom Brady and neck and neck with 2004 Peyton Manning (7.3). That doesn't mean that Anderson is a bad player getting lucky, just that he's playing well over his head.

The question "Is Derek Anderson for real?" is a loaded one, better for its titular vivacity than its meaningfulness. What we can say with some certainty is that Anderson is likely much better than scouts predicted, but also not nearly as good as he now looks. He's not lead footed like Drew Bledsoe, but in many ways their games are comparable. Both have cannons, both need time in the pocket to cram the barrel full of powder and both can rain artillery fire on teams that fail to bring heat. Bledsoe, throughout his career, was infamous for mixing stretches of great play with bouts of disastrous failure. The Seahawks game plan for Sunday in many ways is same as it ever was, disrupt the passing attack with pressure and attempt to force turnovers. If Cleveland's MOR pass blocking can tame Seattle's 3rd ranked pass rush, the Hawks will be forced into a shootout. If Seattle can pressure the gunner, the plume may come off Anderson's cannon in a flash.

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I want to see how well Derek Anderson plays...
when he has Julian Peterson swinging from his helmet and Daryl Tapp tackling his knees.

by Stevo on Oct 31, 2007 12:32 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Defensive backs
As important as Peterson, Tapp, and I'd add Rocky, getting pressure on Anderson will be whether Marshall mixes up the coverage packages.  When out defense has been victimized, it's been with short-to-medium passes against our every-down zone.  Against a young QB like Anderson, it will be more important than ever for Marshall to mix things up, not just with the rush packages but with the coverage.  Braylon Edwards is good enough that he is capable of eating our zone alive over the middle, especially if Anderson has any time to throw.

Maybe throwing some different looks out of the flexible 3-3 nickle (e.g. dropping Peterson in coverage) is a good way to go.  The crux is we can't allow Anderson to see the same coverage every play.

by jeager on Oct 31, 2007 8:58 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am not the originator of this knowledge
merely a courier of it, but it seems that we always do a zone blitz on third and long, and we blitz the wrong side of the zone each time.  
Anyone wanna play WoW?

by Christian on Oct 31, 2007 9:15 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Our blitzes suck
Seems like they work a lesser percentage of time than most teams.  I remember the Arizona game thinking that AZ must have stolen the Seahawks' defense playbook.  Every time we blitzed, we blitzed right into their blocking scheme.

Seems like as often as not, when we get pressure it's with the down 4.

Also, John's talked before about bringing Hill more on blitzes to utilize Peterson's superior coverage skills.  Maybe that would help.  Not sure Peterson would take that very well.

by jeager on Oct 31, 2007 11:16 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think he'd mind.
As long as he still got plenty of chances to blitz and work as an end in the 3-3 Nickel.

Our blitzes do suck, and that's something that's very apparent when you chart every down. I've been meaning to do it forever, but I want to make a list of the average outcome of our various formations and blitzes. I can tell you this, when a third and 17 is converted, we probably sent 7. The Hawks are fully capable of creating pass rush with 3-5 rushers, blitzing with 6 or more as anything other than a "show me" play is a mistake.

by John Morgan on Oct 31, 2007 1:01 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Where the writing's bad and the discussion banal.
Start posting about the Seahawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lolcat_small
FG - Training Camp Meet up/Awesome dudes excited to meet other dudes with same interests.
Nielson_small
The Turnaround Season: A Fictional Look Into the 2009 Seattle Seahawks

Recent FanPosts

Imagen_015_small
Misfit is famous!
Small
Trade for Thigpen
Xhand_small
Housh: A Psychic or Loudmouth?
Steve2006_small
THE WAY WE WERE: Comparing the 2009 Seahawks to the 2005 NFC Champions
Michaelscott_small
Impact of Coverage LBs On A Defense?
Small
TE Cameron Morrah signed, 4 years, $1.79 Million
Small
Burleson to train at Athletes' Performance in Arizona
Small
FB Owen Schmitt enters camp as the starter

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Image_114_small Shrug

Jj_flag_detail1_small John Morgan

Editors

Lolcat_small Scruffy Lefty

Authors

Vp081-c_small Christian

Small BrianL

Small abender20

Small Doug Farrar

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports