Draft Day 2: Open Thread

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 7:37 AM PDT

Notice something about my posting times? No, I'm not the living dead or some sort of cyborg built for blogging. I just didn't get much sleep last night. My crazy neighbor decided to have a psychotic freak-out before being arrested beneath my bedroom window a few minutes ago. Ah, Rosemere, do you ever disappoint?

Here's a round-up of links of interest for this too early morning: Mike Tanier is a decent analyst if you can stomach the jokes. Here's his and Michael David Smith's, from the FO crew, take on rounds 1 -3. I don't agree with everything they say, but a point argued intelligently is always worth something.

The Jackson trade still seems to be on, pending a physical.

Festivities begin again in half an hour. I may be here, I may be asleep, I may be outside telling myself to shut-up, repeatedly clearing my throat and yelling non sequitur profanities. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

[Update: Oakland drafts Michael Bush with the first pick of the fourth round. I think almost any team in the NFL would have made that move. That's a terrible offense, so don't expect any eye-popping numbers right away, but Bush is a special talent.]

Update [2007-4-29 14:2:45 by Shrug]: The Darrell Jackson trade to the 49ers is now official. Seattle gets San Francisco's 4th round pick.

Tweet Comment 139 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I must say.

I know that's a short turnaround on the draft stories, but I find all three to be rather slapdash and shallow. I think the heart and soul of Football Outsiders is Aaron Schatz's metrics and the farther they stray from his work the shoddier their analysis becomes.

so it goes

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 7:48 AM PDT reply actions

Well if Randy Moxx is traded for a 4th rounder

I guess DJack for 4th is fair...

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:03 AM PDT reply actions

Moss*

wrong button

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions

Yep.

Man, the Patriots are going to be good, and Jemarcus Russell the last lingering chance you weren't going to bust just flew out the building, buddy. It might be time to invest some of that signing bonus in CDs and low risk mutual funds.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 8:08 AM PDT reply actions

DAMMIT

stupid raiders, taking bush

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:09 AM PDT reply actions

Shoot.

He's going to have his work cut out for him behind that OL.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 8:12 AM PDT reply actions

Yeah

I was hoping they'd pick Pittman because Lamont Jordan is always injured, and he'd be a safer pick

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:14 AM PDT reply actions

STANBACK!!

4th round

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:21 AM PDT reply actions

Yikes, Dallas.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions

San Fran took Jay Moore

A DE from Nebraska, so.. does that mean we trade D-JAck for him?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:23 AM PDT reply actions

No, it was always a later 4th round pick.

124 or 126 I think.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions

So the 4th round pick we get

is almos ta 5th round pick?
Well if we get Boss that'd be ok because Boss would help the team more than DJack, unless we plan on using 5wr sets a lot

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions

lol

Issah "LITTLE JOHN" Stanbeck to Dallas!!

ROMO IS GONNA GET KRUNKED!!!!!!!!!!!

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 8:26 AM PDT reply actions

Suzy Kobler just called Stanback

Isaiah Washington

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:31 AM PDT reply actions

the D-Jack trade is offical

a guess D-Jack can watch the playoffs on TV next season?? hehe..just kidding. Although I wouldn't mind D-jack getting lit up a bit when he comes back to Seattle.

I'm warming up to this deal a bit, im still not a big fan, but it's clear Ruskell didn't want Jackson on this team, so if he feels a 4th rounder is good value then I will take his word for it.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 8:35 AM PDT reply actions

Why'd the saints take Pittman

for when they don't resign Mcallister?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:38 AM PDT reply actions

yeah

I don't get that pick.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions

Soliai

Gone to Miami

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:40 AM PDT reply actions

damn

but honestly I didn't expect Seattle to take him, I think anyone that has character issues, no matter how big or small is not on Ruskell's list.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions

Plus we already got Mebane

who has huge upside like Soliai

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 8:44 AM PDT reply actions

yuck

the Raiders scored 168 points last year??

I knew that O was bad, but sweet jesus that's pathetic. The Bengals and Charges scored almost half that amount in 1 game this season.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:09 AM PDT reply actions

Yes. That team was/is a trainwreck

It's going to take a few good drafts to reutrn to an semblance of contention. Holes galore.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions

Hawks on the clock

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:12 AM PDT reply actions

Atkins

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:15 AM PDT reply actions

BARAKA!!!!!!! WOO HOO!

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:15 AM PDT reply actions

A very good value for the 4th round

And another pick coming right up.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:17 AM PDT reply actions

looks like another solid Ruskell pick

"Has as much natural athleticism as players that will be taken in the first round. He is a versatile defender that can make plays in pursuit and can dominate his side of the line when playing focused and using his hands to shed blockers. He will get too tall off the snap at times and then fails to counter if his first move is blocked. He ran in the high 4.6's with 33-inch vertical at his workouts. He has an ideal NFL body type as he can carry as much as 290-295 without losing his speed or athleticism. However, he can also tone down to 275-280 and be used as a strong-side defensive end."

From Yahoo!

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:20 AM PDT reply actions

Free to Dallas

damn, I wanted someone for NIU on this team!

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:22 AM PDT reply actions

and...seattle is on the clock

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:23 AM PDT reply actions

Uh...Who?

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:27 AM PDT reply actions

Wrotto

d-lineman turned O-lineman, thats all I know

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:27 AM PDT reply actions

Tech Bio for Wrotto

http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/wrotto_mansfield00.html

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:28 AM PDT reply actions

blocked for the ACC's leading rusher

sounds like a nice pickup.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions

And 7 questions with wrotto

http://nflexperts.scout.com/2/637007.html

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:29 AM PDT reply actions

After reading the 7 questions/answers

He seems like a good guy. I kind of wish the questions had been more in depth but it does give a little insight into the person.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions

next pick is 161

We have to go TE, I think we may go with Allen the local boy that when to the D3 school that I can't spell.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 9:39 AM PDT reply actions

Chandler the TE from Iowa just went

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 9:40 AM PDT reply actions

Solid

Atkins will be an awesome no. 2 LE next year, maybe even move inside at times.

Wrotto is a hoggggg. HUGE, nasty, strong, a good RG prospect...

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 9:58 AM PDT reply actions

good to hear

sounds like two good picks.

Josh Brown is better than you.

by MFAN on Apr 29, 2007 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions

Hogggg

I love this pick...

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 10:12 AM PDT reply actions

I'd rather get

Beekman or Free, but Wrotto sounds like a good worker with tons of upside
Love the Atkins pick obviously, guess JM hit the nail on the head with that one.
No we have to get a TE, Boss or Allan please

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:35 AM PDT reply actions

Dammit

Giants take Boss

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:43 AM PDT reply actions

If Joe Newton could stay healthy

he'd be pretty good. Maybe we can get him in the 7th?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:47 AM PDT reply actions

Anotehr TE from Oregon taken

Dante Rosario

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:48 AM PDT reply actions

I guess we are probably targeting Newton or Allan

now at TE

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 10:51 AM PDT reply actions

Probably

But why is Patrick falling so far? Most mocks I saw had us picking him in the 3rd round

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:52 AM PDT reply actions

Oh ya forgot about him

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions

Holy shit Moss is a Patriot?

And I hope Dallas plans on Stanback playing WR

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 10:54 AM PDT reply actions

Oh and I am sad to see D Jack go

but I don't think he will be that good in San Fran

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 10:56 AM PDT reply actions

I don't know why but

Suzy Kolber Now > Suzy Kolber 10 years ago

I think its the hair

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 10:59 AM PDT reply actions

Probably the plastic surgery

or maybe your standards are lower.
Aren't you in College? Maybe its because now you're old enough to like girls, and 10 years ago you were 10.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions

Sure I'm only 21

but older women are hot

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions

I was thinking the same thing

She exudes sultriness.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions

If we get a backup RB

what about Ramonce Taylor, he looks good but small. Though his character is a HUGE question mark, I wish Ruskell would draft one character-questionable guy every year.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 10:59 AM PDT reply actions

Now that I think about I think Patrick

is going to be our next pick

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:01 AM PDT reply actions

I sure hope so

What a steal

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions

Though this isn't postiive

" never going to be a seam-stretching weapon in the NFL. He hasn't spent much time working as an in-line blocker and has been more of an H-back throughout his career"

From ESPN

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions

Seahawks pick

please Michael Allan or Ben Patrick

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT reply actions

And were on the clock

and Patrick is there

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT reply actions

Michael Allan's says

" Is fast enough to work the seam "

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:04 AM PDT reply actions

Why don't the talking heads shut up

And start doing analysis of the recent picks. It's the draft after all.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT reply actions

I know, I hate that, they're so stupid

Why televise the draft and talk about crap? Give the late round guys some fucking respect

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT reply actions

Nope...Herring

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT reply actions

FUCK

OLB Will Herring???

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT reply actions

Who'd we take I missed it

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:06 AM PDT reply actions

2 TE's I'd love to have, and we really

need a TE, and we take an OLB?
We have 6 servicable LBS don't we?
PEterson, Tatupu, Hill, Bentley, Lewis, Niko Suave

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:06 AM PDT reply actions

DD lewis is gone

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions

5

good enough for me

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions

we need 6

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions

Auburn Bio for Herring

http://auburntigers.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/herring_will00.html

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:06 AM PDT reply actions

What the fuck is that?

Errr...I'm guessing there's something really special about this guy that Ruskell liked. Otherwise, I don't see the advanatage in picking an undersized weakside 'backer...

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 11:07 AM PDT reply actions

A safety converted to LB

Looks like coverage LB

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:07 AM PDT reply actions

ESPN gives hime a grade of 30!

the minimum! There is NO information on him.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:07 AM PDT reply actions

Yea

Because scouts inc. isn't exactly a premier scouting service.

Herring should be a no. 2 strong safety/no. 4 OLB type guy who plays a lot on special teams. He's a very high character guy (surprise), too.

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions

I trust Ruskell and all

But pick this guy in the 7th round
And get a TE in the 5th when two are still available.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:11 AM PDT reply actions

Brent Calek

a random TE just got taken. Must be something wrong with Patrick and Allan?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT reply actions

I wonder if he is going to be converted to S

Fast, 6'3" 221 ish. He played Saftey for 3 years.

He was a QB in high school. 2nd team all SEC as a Safety.

Meh.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT reply actions

Why doesn't it say anything about his 2006

on the school website?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions

Don't know

He played 3 years at S. Last year was his first at LB.

I smell Special Teams player.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions

I really doubt he will play saftey

hes to big

I'm guessing he might be here to fill that 3rd down passing situation LB that Hill kept getting burnt on

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions

Yeah.

I definitely could see him out there on 3rd down passing situations.

Lots of special teams play.

I think there was better talent available for this pick.

Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time

by Ben in Va on Apr 29, 2007 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions

So we don't have Bentley anymore?

Why can't he do this?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions

To address depth

I think you overracting because we haven't taken a TE. We have 3 picks left

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions

I suppose

but why not take one of those two TEs? They probably won't be there the next round. Herring almost definetley will

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions

maybe they know something we don't

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions

About the TEs or Herring

I'm not saying Herring is a bad player, he led his team in tackles the last two years, I'm saying that if he's projected to go 7th or undrafted, might as well draft in the 6th, unless he's so good in their opinion that they can't risk it.
Kind of like a fantasy draft, where 2 years ago, I was in a league where everyone forgot about Beltran, and I got him in the 4th round. Sure he should've gone in the 2nd or 1st, but I waited until the spot that he was probably going to be taken, just a bit before.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions

Ya he was projected that

but doesn't mean thats how teams had him ranked

Look at Patrick he was supposed to be a 3rd round pick

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions

When is Troy Smith

going to be picked? Would he be a good 6th round pick?

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 11:20 AM PDT reply actions

Seahawks

Already have Mebane and Wilson on Depth Chart

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:21 AM PDT reply actions

Forgot link

http://www.seahawks.com/Team/Team.aspx?show=depth

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions

I just scout.com mock for the Hawks

had them taking Mebane with their 3rd rounder

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 11:28 AM PDT reply actions

Wonder how GreenBay

got 3 6th round picks in a row

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:12 PM PDT reply actions

You were right Scruffy

Both PAtrick and Allan still available with 5 picks to go

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:26 PM PDT reply actions

to go before our pick I mean

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions

Now it's our pick.

Hopefully we choose one of them.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions

Seahawks on the clock!

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:34 PM PDT reply actions

And we pick

Taylor?

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 12:37 PM PDT reply actions

Courtney Taylor

WR from Auburn

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:37 PM PDT reply actions

It's hilarious that GB

drafted a guy named Clowney.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 12:38 PM PDT reply actions

SOLID PICK

Courtney Taylor's a big, physical possession guy who was an absolute stud when he had a quarterback with Jason Campbell.

I think he has starting upside, especially in a WCO.

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 12:39 PM PDT reply actions

I think he could be pretty good

like Hackett, guess Holmgren is more satisfied with POllard then I am though

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:40 PM PDT reply actions

We can still draft

Patrick or Allan with pick no. 210.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 12:42 PM PDT reply actions

Yeah

but thre most be something wrong with Patrick, if no one wants him

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:44 PM PDT reply actions

Ok, I'm back.

Passed out there. I'm very happy with the Baraka Atkins pick. I'm not too keen on Wrotto, his biggest assets are his size, his first-step and the possibility that he will improve a bunch with coaching. He's slow and stiff.

At this point, I think Seattle will be looking guard next year, too.

Courtney Taylor is a west coast specialist. Not much upside, basically practice squad depth.

Will Herring is an intriguing athlete. I'm not sure exactly where he fits in on the roster, but he might be, as everyone seems to suspect, being drafted to work in passing situations. You know the MO: undersized, quick, good character guy.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 12:52 PM PDT reply actions

JM

Any guesses as to why Patrick is still available?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 12:56 PM PDT reply actions

Some kind of

minor-moderate injury I'd guess.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions

I think it's because he's a tweener, with a less..

than ideal work-ethic. That's a bad combination.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions

Yeah, sounds bad to me

Michael Allan please, upside, and good character maybe? It doesn't really say because he's a D3 guy who got real good lately, so it can't get pass that fact on most scouting reports

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions

Allan is the real-deal.

I think his stock is being held down because he's a D3 player, but his size, speed and performance are all very good.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions

Any decent RB's avaialble?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 1:07 PM PDT reply actions

NE

might have just took one.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions

Jordan Kent

Another WR?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 1:13 PM PDT reply actions

We're on the clock!

And this time we pick... Jordan Kent. Another WR?

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 1:13 PM PDT reply actions

Well

he's only played football for 3 years, and played bball for Oregon as well as track, and they're both pretty good in both. So he's ahtletic, but a project?

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 1:15 PM PDT reply actions

2 years i mean

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions

Hrmmm

Definite PS candidate, but he has a shitload of athleticism.

by WABronco on Apr 29, 2007 1:15 PM PDT reply actions

2 WRs, one OL...

Not sure we are seeing the same team, here, Tim.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 1:21 PM PDT reply actions

Dang, Patrick got picked

and to a divison rival to make it worse.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 1:28 PM PDT reply actions

T.J.

Who'sYourMama!

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 1:31 PM PDT reply actions

So I'll be back when we make our next pick.

Cross your fingers it's Allan.

Monday, I'll run down Seattle's draft. Ruskell has once again found value late in the draft, but our offensive line really worries me. Ruskell can't really think that Gray is the solution at right guard.

Tuesday, I'll recap our division rivals. The Niners look like the big winners. I wasn't convinced they'd be contenders next year entering the off-season, but, boy, they've sure improved.

Christ, I'm tired.

by John Morgan on Apr 29, 2007 1:38 PM PDT reply actions

The Cardinals

I think had a fine draft too.

by Coach Owens on Apr 29, 2007 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions

Hmmm

I come back to 2 WR's

But I do like both of them

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 1:46 PM PDT reply actions

I'm getting the feeling

if we don't draft a TE guys like Allan and Newton can be picked up via FA

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 1:46 PM PDT reply actions

fuck and KC takes Allan right before us

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 2:07 PM PDT reply actions

HAHA

goddamn we're stupid

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 2:10 PM PDT reply actions

Not really I think we just

but to much into draft importance in TE

Really we could turn Jordan Kent into a pass catching TE if we wanted

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions

Personally I think we should get Brockman

from U-Dub to play TE because he won't be able to make it into the NBA. A lot like Antonio Gates

V. 1.0, mutherf***er, know what I'm sayin'?

by Scruffy Lefty on Apr 29, 2007 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions

AGREED!

He's a great Bball player but will never be a great pro because he's 6'7"
He's a beast, Great character, lifts a lot, can dunk, is decently athletic, he'd be AWESOME. He's tough as nails, very physical, and is a relentless rebounder, which I think will translate well on the football field.

by LantermanC on Apr 29, 2007 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions