Offseason Checklist
This is the first edition of our ongoing offseason checklist. It will be updated as goals are met. I prefer this to a "plan" because it accepts that I, as a blogger, do not know all the factors in play, and therefore can not endorse a team signing nor chide a team for not signing a specific player. At the same time, I think it's a solid analysis of the team's needs, and potential ways of filling those needs. I have grouped this list in three tiers of importance, from priorities at top, to considerations at bottom. Stuff at the bottom is exactly what it's listed as, Considerations, things that could benefit the team and therefore should be considered. Let's start.
Priorities
Draft a Long Term Replacement for Walter Jones
For most priorities I do not define exactly how the team should fill a need, but left tackle is an obvious exception. Top left tackles rarely see free agency, and when they do, are frightfully expensive. Further, this is a gangbusters draft for offensive tackle talent. If Seattle does not acquire a young offensive tackle this offseas on, it will be hard to rate this offseason as anything but a failure.
Re-sign or Franchise Marcus Trufant
Tru is among the very best talents on this roster, add to that his age, his progression and the time it takes to develop a young corner, and this is a slamdunk no-brainer. The team needs to retain Trufant or suffer an extreme drop-off at both corner positions.
Draft, Sign, Develop or Trade For a Starting Left Guard
This is not a key -> keyhole situation. Seattle has a definite need, but no one way of filling it. If 2007 draftee Mansfield Wrotto has shown enough on the practice squad, then Seattle may only be thinking depth. Wrotto certainly has the tools, but late as the 2007 NFL draft, none of the polish. If Seattle wishes to draft a left guard, Duke Robinson is one of the better guard talents to come around in a number of years. Behind him is a deep class, with some top-tier talent. It would not be inconceivable, nor inadvisable, for Seattle to draft two offensive linemen in the first 3 rounds.
Ensure Stability at Head Coach
I'm not going to participate further in the speculation of whether Holmgren will retire or not. I've picked my horse, made it clear months back that I thought that this was Holmgren's last season with the team, and am not going to junior psycho-analyze his recent press conference. Be it Holmgren, Jim Mora Jr, Jon Gruden or Coach X, the Seattle Seahawks are a veteran club that needs stability in its coaching staff. All things considered, Mora would likely be preferable. One thing I definitely wish to avoid is Holmgren coaching one more season, and therefore being the proverbial "lame duck". If Holmgren wishes to stick around, I hope he signs an extension and recommits himself to the craft. When Holmgren says that Stump Mitchell is making the decision as to which running back receives carries, I question his commitment to fielding a winning team.
To Do
Draft, Sign, Develop or Trade for a Starting Caliber Quarterback
Another move that should be done now, and not when the team is so destitute that it must look to the first round of the NFL draft to fill this need. Colt Brennan, John David Booty and/or Erik Ainge may all slip into the third round. Each, to my eyes, have what it takes to make it in the pros.
Permanently Covert Seneca Wallace to Wide Receiver
Wallace has the skills to be a Pro Bowl receiver, but nothing more than an adequate quarterback. Seattle needs a quarterback in place who can eventually supplant Matt Hasselbeck, they need a #1 wide receiver right now. The offseason is the perfect time to commit to turning the 27 y/o old Wallace into a fulltime wide receiver. At the same time, Wallace could still be the emergency, third string quarterback.
Extend a Long Term Contract to Mike Clark and Darren Krein
The Seahawks strength and conditioning coaches are clearly doing a bangup job. Taking care of this little stuff can pay huge dividends in team health.
Clear Up the Running Back Mess
It's not necessary that Seattle use an early round draft pick on a running back. A late round pick, or a low cost castoff like Julius Jones or Mewelde Moore would more than suffice - that is, if Seattle needs to add another running back at all. What is for certain, though, is that Seattle must at the very least drop Shaun Alexander down the depth chart. Way down. Even considering the cap penalty, it is justifiable to outright cut Alexander, ideally after June 1st, so that it would be split over the 2008 and 2009 seasons. Alexander, at his very best as a rusher, is still a liability for his extremely poor play as a receiver. The Seahawks cannot hope to be the best team in football with Shaun Alexander as their starting tailback.
Offer DJ Hackett a 1-Year, Incentive Laden Contract
No team in its right mind would offer Hackett a long term contract after a career wracked with injuries. At the same time, any and every team could use Hackett's talent. For Hackett, his goal is clearly long term security, and that's all about getting paid. He must know that his most recent season is not going to give him the leverage to demand much in free agency. The obvious solution is to offer Hackett an incentive laden one-year offer that will net him some scratch this season, and free him up to get paid next season - Should he earn it.
Considerations
Draft, Sign, Develop or Trade for a Starting Caliber Safety
Whatever you think of Brian Russell, Seattle needs depth at safety. A run stopper who could hold his own in coverage could vault Seattle's already stout run D into exclusive company. For 2 years, Seattle has struggled allowing long runs. Deon Grant is a fine tackler for a free safety, but that statement speaks for itself. A starting caliber strong safety, who might be a little worse in coverage than Russell, but loads better at run stopping, would ameliorate Seattle's worst run weakness (long runs), plus improve the coverage and run stopping play of the free safety (by moving Deon Grant back to his natural position). No other single move could do more to improve Seattle's already very good defense.
Begin Negotiations to Re-Sign Leroy Hill
Hill looks primed for a breakout next season. Incidentally, the season before he enters free agency. Seattle can lock this guy up on the sly now, or battle the market and its inflated rates next offseason.
Draft, Sign...a Replacement for Rocky Bernard
Big Rock has been plagued by injuries each of the last two seasons, and nearing 28, steep decline is a real possibility as early as next season. Seattle should look to gifted one-gap tackles, with good size, that may fall to the later rounds of the draft. That's how they got Big Rock, and that's the best way to replace him.
Draft, Sign...a Tight End
Tight end is simply not the priority it was when Mike Holmgren first joined the Seahawks. Having a tight end on roster that could block and provide a Marcus Pollard (not counting this last contest) level of production in the passing game would be sufficient. That might be Joe Newton, a free agent or a draftee. One way or another, it should not cost Seattle a major outlay of resources.
Attempt to Re-Sign Josh Brown, Ellis Wyms, Niko Koutouvides and Kevin Bentley
In that order of priority, though I might put Wyms ahead of Brown. Don't break the bank for any of them.
Explore Trading Patrick Kerney
Kerney's value is very high, and he stands atop that precipice that has claimed better defensive ends than him: his early 30s. This is the classic Billy Beane, move-'em-while-they're-hot strategy. Not very likely, by any means, but worth exploring.
Explore Trading for Julius Peppers
Don't let one season fool you, Peppers is still a freakish talent in the prime of his career. His 16 million dollar cap number and recent poor performance make him potentially available. Let Randy Moss be an exemplar, when a one of a kind talent is available, every team in its right mind should attempt to get their hands on him.
Feel free to add anything you think I've missed. We'll update this as the offseason progresses.
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
Get a center, maybe?
by Coach Owens on Jan 16, 2008 1:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
What's wrong with Spencer?
by Phildopip on Jan 16, 2008 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I could see going for depth/backup
by Will Kier on Jan 16, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eric Ainge is a piece of shit
But I'm high on David Booty and so so on Brennan
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 16, 2008 3:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
boo on Booty
by Matthew on Jan 16, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How do you feel about David Lee Roth?
by Phildopip on Jan 16, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
slightly less contemptuous
by Matthew on Jan 16, 2008 4:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also if we can't resign Hackett
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 16, 2008 3:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure Williams is not getting cut
I'm hopeing that Jorden Kent made strides on the PS. He's freakishly athletic and definetly could turn out to be a seam strecher.
by joeshow30 on Jan 16, 2008 10:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He contract might of already been voided
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 17, 2008 8:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If that's the case
by joeshow30 on Jan 17, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No run stopping Tackle
by jeager on Jan 16, 2008 4:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tackles
by Gray on Jan 16, 2008 4:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Quarterbacks
It seems like everyone thinks this, this or this quarterback is going to be a bust, and, in all honesty, I understand. Because quarterback is a historically hard position to forecast. But I really have a hard time knowing why everyone feels the way that they do. Now, if you take a player like JaMarcus Russell, who had incredible talent around him, and who half his passes were wide receiver screens, sure, that looks like a bust. But w/ a player like Ainge, who had crap for a supporting cast, ran a pro style offense in which he called his own audibles, I don't know why so many people are down on him. I'm not saying I possess the Holy Grail of qb scouting, but, just out of curiosity, what is it that everyone likes or dislikes about the different quarterbacks. Here's some of my opinions in brief.
Andre Woodson: Bust, can't move, modern pass rush will eat him alive. Otherwise, good skills, great read, great arm.
Brian Brohm: Didn't see enough of.
Booty: Boom. I think Booty is the best quarterback in the class. Solid all around skills. Enough mobility. Prototypical build. Good read. Ran a pro style offense. Would be a 4 year starter if he hadn't played behind Leinart. I think he will be better than Leinart.
Brennan: Boom,Fast delivery, good timing, accurate, limited read, very good mobility. A bit of project, but has excellent upside, especially in a spread or West Coast system.
Ainge: Very smart, a backup at worst. Great read, great blitz awareness, strong arm.
I think a darkhorse is Chase Daniel, who needs only to be able to survive in the NFL to be able to succeed. I would put the ability to avoid pass rush and find throwing lanes way above height - that is, unless the player is too small.
I didn't get a chance to see too many other players, but Woodson is the one I feel strongest about. Way too immobile, just don't think he can survive against an NFL pass rush.
by John Morgan on Jan 16, 2008 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Woodson follow up:
Even Colt Brennan can't touch that sort of sackage. I feel bad for the team that's going to draft Woodson in the first round thinking they have their answer at quarterback. Those numbers bring Drew Bledsoe to mind. Funny, too, because the dude's pigmented, the scouting reports talk about his "ability to scramble", Woodson couldn't scramble an egg.
by John Morgan on Jan 16, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How much of Ainge have you watched?
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 16, 2008 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
people certainly have trouble...
ainge and woodson are a tough call for me. living in and SEC state means i've seen tons of both (woodson live). ainge has more polish, does the little things better. woodson may be slightly more talented, and had far less to work with.
a sleeper that some may forget about is dennis dixon. he was the best qb i saw this year. i'd draft him in a heartbeat, possibly even in the third.
by dcrockett17 on Jan 17, 2008 7:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
QB thoughts
:: slow as molasses, but his o-line was dreck. what worries me most is that he doesn't get rid of the ball. he takes unnecessary hits. he reminds me of tony banks, but smarter, more polished.
Brian Brohm: Didn't see enough of.
:: i question the arm a bit, but everything else is there. obviously benefited from a wide open system, where he got a lot of run after catch on his pass totals. sliding a little in the draft, thus lowering expectations, may be the best thing that ever happened to him. he's a solid backup at absolute worst i'd think.
Booty: Boom. I think Booty is the best quarterback in the class...
:: i would agree except i feel like he's just not that accurate on the intermediate stuff (15-20 yards in the air). he never misses his "layup" throws (i.e., dump-offs, screens, short stuff) but i don't think he's a guy you ask to throw through tight windows down the field. hell, not missing layups keeps the chains moving, which is way more valuable than the occasionally great throw. he also doesn't take unnecessary sacks.
Brennan: Boom,Fast delivery, good timing, accurate, limited read, very good mobility. A bit of project, but has excellent upside, especially in a spread or West Coast system.
:: ditto. funky release reminds me of bledsoe's. fortunately he's not cursed with drew's feet of clay.
Ainge: Very smart, a backup at worst. Great read, great blitz awareness, strong arm.
:: ainge IS cursed with bledsoe's feet of clay. he may be the closest thing to bledsoe since bledsoe. fortunately, he gets rid of the ball and doesn't take a lot of unnecessary hits. hard to evaluate him because his surrounding talent was more inconsistent than poor--but yeesh he has a knack for the back-breaking pick at the worst possible time. ainge will have played with more pro talent than just about anyone on this list save booty. so you don't know what to attribute his poor performances to.
I think a darkhorse is Chase Daniel,
:: he's coming back to school next year. (disclosure: missouri undergrad, so i follow the team fairly closely.) daniel is a tough call. what's a bigger problem for him than size is barely average athleticism. he may not be athletic enough to get to his throwing lanes against top caliber college defenses. (oklahoma continually forced him outside the pocket and was able to keep him contained with their speed. when ou tried the same strategy vs pat white and you saw what happened.) still, he's got brains, good feet, and a pro arm. and i only recently became convinced about the arm.
by dcrockett17 on Jan 17, 2008 7:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agreed. A big run stopping tackle is
by Harrison on Jan 16, 2008 4:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great discussion thread!
Does anyone really think Hass will be replaced in the next 3 years as the Seattle starting QB? He has had more injuries in the past couple years, but he still has the talent and motivation to be a top 10 NFL QB for the next 3 seasons or so.
Drafting someone in the 3rd/4th round and developing them behind Becks is a pretty damn good idea. It IS what Hass did after all to begin his career and it certainly turned out well for him. Would seem to be the perfect time for such a move.
Hopefully Ruskell and company can fill most of these needs in the offseason. Whether or not the Hawks have the cap room to complete all of them will be key.
by SeattleSlayer on Jan 16, 2008 5:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
They haven't moved Seneca
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 16, 2008 7:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not much of an excuse
If Seneca would've been groomed as a WR from day 1 he could have been very effective as a Randel El type. We also would probably not have had to give up a first rounder for Deion Branch, who arguably hasn't been worth it.
by SeattleSlayer on Jan 16, 2008 7:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually coming into 2005
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 16, 2008 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is a Holmgren comment on Seneca playing WR
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 17, 2008 7:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
John, shouldn't that be
by Coach Owens on Jan 16, 2008 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like your thinking John
Next years draft class for OG's is going to be good with Duke Robinson, Jeramy Perry, and Herman Johnson as possible first rounders.
I honestly think that Ruskell is going to try and break the bank and give Faneca a big contract. Other FA possibilities are Ryan Lilja LG Indy, and Jacob Bell LG Tenn.
by joeshow30 on Jan 16, 2008 10:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I thought both Robinson and Perry were...
by John Morgan on Jan 17, 2008 2:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So, what in your opinion should they do
Also would you be afraid if heading into next season Willis was the starting RT. I was not able to see the Atlanta game so I'm not sure how he can handle it.
by joeshow30 on Jan 17, 2008 11:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Frye and Seneca
- Frye is viewed by Ruskell and/or Holmgren as an eventual, long-term replacement for Beck. What makes us think that?
- Seneca could be a Pro Bowl WR. What makes us think that (other than his one big-time reception in the '05 Carolina game)?
by jeager on Jan 17, 2008 6:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Here is the link to the Ruskell interview
He says the trade for Frye is more of a long term solution, which leads me to believe that he is being groomed to be a starter.
by Scruffy Lefty on Jan 17, 2008 7:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN
If you think trading Kerney is a good idea, and I don't disagree, could trading Kerney for Chester Taylor be a possibility/advisable?
I'd love to see the early draft picks used on Offensive linemen and maybe the best way to do that is to fill the RB need outside the draft so the temptation to draft a RB isn't there.
by Snuffleupagus on Jan 17, 2008 7:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Vikes would do that trade in a heartbeat
by joeshow30 on Jan 17, 2008 11:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that's what I was wondering
by Snuffleupagus on Jan 17, 2008 11:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 













